Research round-up no. 1: Edith Wharton and The Custom of the Country

Borrowing liberally from Esther’s Innogen and the Hungry Half preview posts, Research Round-up will be a small, curated collection of neat stuff that comes across my desk during my academic research.  Currently, I share one song, two people, and three lines, and I hope to do so each week.  (And if you still haven’t read Innogen, what are you waiting for?!)

The semester has really only begun, but I’m off to the races on my masters thesis.  I have a reading calendar that is rapidly filling up, a personal goal to write 2 pages every day, a thesis group that has already proven invaluable, and initial deadlines for each of my three chapters.

The first, which I’ve just started drafting, focuses on Edith Wharton’s 1913 novel The Custom of the Country.  I took a class on Wharton during my first grad semester, but it only scratched the surface of her extensive bibliography.  Now I’m getting a chance to dig a little deeper (though not much, seriously, she wrote so. many. things).  While it’s tangential to my argument about Wharton’s work, I’m really struck by her engagement with modernist culture, something that isn’t always clear in her novels.

One song

The 1913 Paris première of Stravinsky’s Le Sacre du Printemps has been well-documented; the crowd, offended by the modern music and strange dance style, rioted in the theatre.  The moment is now considered one of those turning points of the modern era.  (For an excellent discussion of the ballet and its relationship to modernism and the Great War, I highly recommend Modris Eksteins’s Rites of Spring.)   A long list of modernist culture-makers were associated with the production, either through Ballet Russes or by being in attendance.

But it wasn’t just the darlings of the avant-garde in the theatre that night; Wharton witnessed the ballet and the riots as well.  She noted in her journal that she found the performance “extraordinary.”

Two people

Henry James (1843 – 1916)

Wharton was close friends with James up until his death in 1916.  He famously encouraged her to “do New York,” but the shadow of his influence also hung over her writing for her entire career.  He visited her in Paris in 1908, while she was just beginning to work on Custom; while there, she convinced him to sit for this portrait by Jacques-Émile Blanche.

Edmund Wilson (1895 – 1972)

Wilson was an accomplished literary critic and famously kind of a dick.  In an essay seeking to do “Justice to Edith Wharton,” he described the main character of Custom as “the prototype in fiction of the ‘gold-digger,’ the international cocktail bitch.”  This phrase, and its attendent weird literary misogyny, inspired my thesis project.

Three lines

She wanted to be noticed but she dreaded to be patronized, and here again her hostess’s gradations of tone were confusing. Mrs. Fairford made no tactless allusions to her being a newcomer in New York—there was nothing as bitter to the girl as that—but her questions as to what pictures had interested Undine at the various exhibitions of the moment, and which of the new books she had read, were almost as open to suspicion, since they had to be answered in the negative. Undine did not even know that there were any pictures to be seen, much less that “people” went to see them; and she had read no new book but “When The Kissing Had to Stop,” of which Mrs. Fairford seemed not to have heard.

— Edith Wharton, The Custom of the Country

Further adventures

For a random assortment of photos, quotes, video, and other items tangentially related to my thesis, check out nonmodernist on tumblr.

And as always, you can follow all my grad school adventures in real-time via the “grad school is forever” tag on tumblr.

Vintage Movie Monday: The Silent Films of Anita Loos (1912 – 1916)

The silent film has gotten a bit of a boost recently: The Artist, a modern silent “classic,” scooped up many BAFTA nominations, won big at the Golden Globes, and will probably fare pretty well at the Oscars too.  I haven’t seen it yet, but my thesis research into the career of Anita Loos has meant that I’ve recently spent time immersing myself in the art of silent cinema.

Loos wrote an incredible number of screenplays, treatments, and scenarios during the silent era, and continued working in the talkies both pre- and post-Hayes Code.  Many of these films are now lost, but several of them have luckily been preserved.  Even better, a handful are available to watch for free through the Internet Archive.

While these early silents aren’t the best demonstration of Loos’s vivid wit and style, they are a fascinating glimpse into the work of a young (very young) artist who is just getting started.

For a more scholarly take on Loos’s silent film writing work, I highly recommend Laura Frost’s article, “Blondes Have More Fun: Anita Loos and the Language of Silent Cinema.”

 

The New York Hat | 1912

The New York Hat was directed by D W Griffith for the Biograph Studio in 1912. It has many of Griffith’s stock players in it. You may spot Mae Marsh as a gossip or Lillian Gish as a customer in the store but the main roles are played by Lionel Barrymore as the pastor and Mary Pickford as he girl. The script was written by Anita Loos.

This 16-minute short film was Loos’s third screenplay and the very first to be produced.  She earned $25 for it.  It was filmed at Fort Lee, New Jersey, where many silent films were produced in the early days of cinema.

Loos would go on to write title cards for Griffith’s Intolerance, a huge boost for her burgeoning career.

His Picture in the Papers | 1916

A young man can only get the woman he loves if he becomes famous, and manages to get his picture in the newspapers. He determines to let nothing stand in the way of his doing exactly that, and in the process winds up getting involved with a gang of criminals and a locomotive chase.

This hour-long silent film was written by Anita Loos (still quite early in her career) and directed by her future husband, John Emerson.  It starred Douglas Fairbanks.  Loos write five films for Fairbanks and made him quite a star.

Her witty writing style is on display here in the title cards, which play with ideas of language, reading, and thinking.  For example, a title card introduces Count Xxerkzsxxv, with a note reading, “To those of you who read titles aloud, you can’t pronounce the Count’s name. You can only think it.” Continue Reading »

New York, briefly

Good morning, New York City.

I took a brief jaunt up to New York this week to visit Josh on a work trip.  It was a bit of a work trip for me as well — I used the time to visit the Met and see some art related to my thesis (and some not), and I spent a little time working in the NYPL reading room.

Below are some highlights from my walk around the Met, which I’ve decided once and for all is my favorite US art museum. Occasionally I pretend that I will bother visiting a new museum when in the city, but then I inevitably end up on the train back to 86th Street, strolling the clean and usually empty streets on the east side of Central Park, and then ascending the giant, famous staircase.

The relics of gilded age New York.

Caryatid, Gilded Age New York.

Charlotte Louise Burckhardt

John Singer Sargent, Lady with the Rose (Charlotte Louise Burckhardt).

Philippe Pavy, 1886.

Philippe Pavy, In a Courtyard, Tangiers.

Iranian textile art.

Iranian textile art.

The new galleries for Middle Eastern art were an absolute delight, and I wish I had spent more time in them.  Definitely a must-see for the next visit.

On the topic of textile art, I bought an engagement book for myself that presented a rather interesting, thesis-related research challenge.  The book’s text misattributed a work of textile art inspired by Anita Loos’s Gentlemen Prefer Blondes.  I did a bit of sleuthing and tracked down what was really going on over at my tumblr.

Presenting: The Parade’s End read-along!

This will be a fandom-friendly* read-along of the Ford Madox Ford tetralogy, spanning several months, in anticipation of the (as-yet-undated) airing of Parade’s End, written by Tom Stoppard, directed by Susanna White, and starring Benedict Cumberbatch and Rebecca Hall.

When: The read-along will begin on February 1, 2012.  At that time, we’ll publish a schedule guide for each section of the first book.

Why: Because of ~reasons~ obviously.  For instance, we love early twentieth-century literature; we’re excited for the upcoming BBC/HBO television adaptation; we love Downton Abbey and want more things like it in our lives.

Where: All over the internet!  This read-along will primarily be hosted through nonmodernist and on Twitter (using #ParadesEnd), but we love all the corners of the internet and we want them all to join us!  Look for discussion posts on Dreamwidth and Livejournal, and links to content all over the place.  Feel free to blog your responses at your own site or the service of your choice — as long as you send them to us, we’ll put the links in our round-ups.

How: Read the books!  Post about them!  Join our discussions and submit your posts to our linkspams!  Livetweet your reading sessions!  There’s no right or wrong way to participate.

Get started: First, spread the word!  This only works if you all get involved (and corral your friends, enemies, neighbors, and family members to do the same).  Follow nonmodernist for more updates as we approach the start date.  Then acquire a copy of the book and get ready to start reading!

______

* “fandom-friendly”: we mean that this read-along will be a safe space for fandom-style participation.  We recognize and defend your right to create fanworks of any and all kinds, flail over anything and everything, and use as much fandom slang as you desire.  While some discussions may get a little academic, others will be shallow and all about the pretty.

Sherlock and the hound

I promised myself I would blog my reactions to each Sherlock episode this series, but I’m afraid it’s just going to get repetitive if I keep writing, “Well, that was basically the best thing ever.”

But it was.  Again.

In a series of three episodes, the middle has a tendency to be the closest thing to filler: a little running-in-place, a little time-wasting between the triumphant introduction and the dramatic finale.  Last series’s middle episode, “The Blind Banker,” was certainly the weakest of the three.  But this time around, versed as we all are in Sherlock’s style of deduction and no need to continue introducing him to us, we’re treated to a standalone episode that reworks Conan Doyle’s detective-horror tale.  The choice to bank on adrenaline to overcome the placeholder status of the middle episode was a smart one, to be sure.

Mark Gatiss is a brilliant purveyor of horror in any form, be it detective story, documentary, or sketch comedy series.  ”The Hounds of Baskerville” not only upped the horror quotient, it continued with the current series’s mission to humanize Sherlock through his relationships.  Out in the Devon countryside, his friendship with John took center stage.  I enjoy that the series has yet to let the mistaken-for-boyfriends gag drop; but jokes aside, it continues to mine their interactions for emotional depth.  Again, this is all build-up for next week’s “The Reichenbach Fall,” which I’ve already heard is a tearjerker in the extreme.

Sherlock was at his most manic last night as well, at least at the episode’s start.  Benedict Cumberbatch is a tour de force whose work must be seen to be believed.  He’s fearless, thrilling, and always on.  There are literally not enough things in the world that I could say about Cumberbatch as an actor.

Lastly, last night’s episode was yet another reference-hunters dream.  It featured, among other things:

  • Being Human‘s resident werewolf, Russell Tovey, as a man haunted by memories of a giant hound in the woods
  • John Philip Sousa, Elvis, and a whole range of other references, during an inspired depiction of Sherlock’s mental indexing and cross-referencing process
  • and a lovely nod to Undershaw, Conan Doyle’s endangered estate (where he wrote The Hound of the Baskervilles)
  • an episode tag that led into the BBC’s tie-in viral marketing with this eerie video blog

And with all this under our belt, we’re only one away from the end!  Time to brush up on the canon with “The Final Problem,” Conan Doyle’s attempt to shuffle off his hero’s mortal coil.

Lancastrian scene

Sherlock is back (again!) (some more!!)

image from watsonjohn.tumblr.com

Sherlock is back and my general attitude toward the show can be summed up with the above gif.  Last night’s “A Scandal in Belgravia” proved that we haven’t even seen what this team is capable of yet.  There were emotional highs and lows, cases galore, oneliners and character-study set pieces, and a twisty, turn-y plot that ended up ranging pretty far from its source material.

I actually had to watch twice because my brain was tripping over itself trying to figure out what was coming next during my first viewing.  The altered plot of “A Scandal in Bohemia” occupies only the first section of the episode; things go much further from there.  One of the things this show does best is take details from the stories and remix them in new and delightful variations.  While I prefer the canonical opera singer Irene to the BBC’s dominatrix Irene, it was thrilling to watch the updated version reveal her hiding place as a result of the fire trick, and see completely through his vicar disguise, and all the rest of it.

The show has also, now that we’re in the second season, begun remixing itself.  As has been pointed out on tumblr, the whole phone plot is a callback to the very first episode:

I really like the symmetry with Irene’s phone. Allow me to explain. In ASiP, Sherlock makes a series of deductions about John’s “brother” Harry from the hand-me-down mobile. He says “If she’d left him, he would have kept it. People do, sentiment.”

Then lo and behold. The end of scandal. He wants to keep Irene’s phone. Sentiment.

Well spotted!

(If I had more time, I would love to compile all the annotations and notes about this new batch of episodes; as it is, I’ll likely only be able to link and mention a few for each.)

I do have to take a moment to shout out my favorite re-titled case: “The Geek Interpreter,” which has been written up on the BBC’s excellent tie-in website of John’s blog.

At its heart, though, this episode centered around the strange emotional ties in Sherlock’s life.  I have to say, I’m pleased with the show’s commitment to a very specific, 21st-century understanding of asexuality.  The original story, told from Watson’s perspective, represents things a little bit differently, but I’ve always chalked this up to Watson’s subjective writing style.  He may write with a tone of mastery that leaves little room for interpretation, but his view is just as subjective as any other.

TSHERLOCK HOLMES she is always the woman. I have seldom heard him mention her under any other name. In his eyes she eclipses and predominates the whole of her sex. It was not that he felt any emotion akin to love for Irene Adler. All emotions, and that one particularly, were abhorrent to his cold, precise but admirably balanced mind. He was, I take it, the most perfect reasoning and observing machine that the world has seen, but as a lover he would have placed himself in a false position. He never spoke of the softer passions, save with a gibe and a sneer. They were admirable things for the observer–excellent for drawing the veil from men’s motives and actions. But for the trained reasoner to admit such intrusions into his own delicate and finely adjusted temperament was to introduce a distracting factor which might throw a doubt upon all his mental results. Grit in a sensitive instrument, or a crack in one of his own high-power lenses, would not be more disturbing than a strong emotion in a nature such as his. And yet there was but one woman to him, and that woman was the late Irene Adler, of dubious and questionable memory.

The John of “Belgravia” has far less of a clue about what is going on inside Sherlock’s head, and the emotional effect of this change is startling.  John, usually the one adept at social situations in a way Sherlock is not, founders when asked to play interpreter to Sherlock’s emotional state.

I think this was the perfect moment to go for the show to go for the heart, and it did so on a tremendous scale.  The episode highlighted each and every one of Sherlock’s major relationships, while also giving him another, totally different one to cope with.

Nothing has changed since Sherlock met Irene, and yet everything has.  I can’t wait to see where we go from here.

Dressing up to stay home for New Year’s Eve

Glammed up for NYE at home.

Josh and I aren’t big on partying out on the town, at least not where we currently live.  And I’m especially not fond of going out on New Year’s Eve, which is just too crowded and too crazy for a girl like me.  But just because we’re staying home doesn’t mean I can’t get dressed up for the occasion!

I love these patterned tights beyond belief.  I tend to avoid trends until some of the initial buzz has died down, and even then I like to cautiously see if they fit with my personal style.  I know patterned tights have been a thing for quite a while, but I’m just now thinking about working them into my outfits regularly.

If I were going out tonight, here would be my top tips for staying comfy and having fun during a hectic holiday bar-session:

  1. Wear comfortable heels or flats, unless you’re attending a party at a friend’s house where you can kick them off or stay sitting down.
  2. Carry a clutch small enough to fit in your hand, but big enough to contain your phone.
  3. Layer to stay warm!  It’s actually unseasonably warm right now, but usually this is a chilly holiday.  Try layering a thicker tank top under your dress — it’ll keep you warm and it probably won’t add too much bulk.  Wear socks inside your boots.  If it’s really cold, wear two pairs of stockings, or stockings and legwarmers.
  4. Keep jewelry to a minimum (less fussy) but dress up your nails with a metallic polish.  I love bronze.
  5. I would go with lip tint instead of lipstick, since lots of drinks means lots of reapplying.  Also, bronze eyeliner applied to the inner corner of the eyes gives a nice pop of color (and matches the nail polish!).
  6. Make sure to drink a glass of water in between each drink!

Happy New Year!

A detective on Christmas: Dorothy L. Sayers’s Strong Poison

I blogged about a Christmas film noir, but I didn’t actually mean to read a Christmas detective story as well.  But Dorothy L. Sayers’s Strong Poison was calling out to me from the shelf where I’d stuck it, just above a collection of Poe’s mystery stories.  I actually bought the book several years ago in Atlanta, and I’d packed it up and moved it across the country with me, but I’d still never read it.

Well, I had tried once, when I originally purchased it.  But the first chapters are a bit slow, and my attention span was not great, so it returned to the shelf.  This time around, however, I pushed through the clunky opening and found myself totally taken with Lord Peter Wimsey and Harriet Vane.

The book begins at the end of a murder trial: a neat device for catching the reader up on the details quickly, but the voice of the stodgy judge is a bit much to wade through.  Luckily, he disappears as soon as the hung jury refuses to deliver a verdict as to whether detective novelist Harriet Vane poisoned her one-time lover with arsenic.  Wimsey has been present at the trial and really taken to Vane, who he knows didn’t commit the murder.  He vows to clear her name, find the real killer if he can, and then marry Vane.  She’s grateful for the first two but has some other ideas about the last one.

The Christmas aspect is actually minimal; with the retrial set after the winter holiday, Wimsey spends the Christmas season making his investigation (and trying to convince the Chief Detective Inspector to marry his sister already).  But Sayers uses the holiday setting to get in a few witty jabs:

“Great bore, Christmas, isn’t it? All the people one hates most gathered together in the name of goodwill and all that.”

Sayers creates Wimsey as a sarcastic but lovable aristocrat who has friends in all sorts of unexpected places, always ready to help him out when needed.  I particularly love his “Cattery,” the temp typist pool he maintains and sends off to work typing jobs/do recon on suspects.  In fact, all the secondary characters, who adore Wimsey and help him in his sleuthing, are wonderfully drawn and a joy to follow.

It’s worth noting that Sayers herself was a pretty badass lady, not unlike Vane.  She was one of the first women to take a degree from Oxford and was made a Baker Street Irregular.

Sadly, it looks like the next two Peter and Harriet books, Have His Carcase and Gaudy Night, are currently out of print.  I’ll be tracking down used copies as soon as I can, because I can’t wait to read more featuring the two of them.

TFL: End-of-the-year favorites

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows - I counted myself as a huge, huge fan of the first Sherlock Holmes film, but even I knew this one would have to step up its game if it wanted to outshine the balls-out amazing modern-day BBC interpretation that aired last summer.  Ritchie stepped up to the plate.  This one was a near-perfect distillation of everything that made the first work, without all the bullshit that dragged it down.  And while they basically played their big hand, I’d still fork over many dollars to see a follow-up.

Over at The Film League, Josh and I have been writing up our favorite games (2), movies, and tv shows of the year